Teams

UPTA65C/Woerz/Keowee Key

2026 UPTA Combo 65 & Over - SC · 65+ Combo Men - 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Performance Tennis at Brookstone Meadows
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Douglas Wright
Sep 27 1:00 PM
Douglas Wright
2026-09-01vs UPTA65C/Wright/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesRalph Mosca / Brett Kreisher vs Greg Brock / Terry Orr6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLarry Wingard / David Pontell vs Earl Claypool / Rickey Bridges6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDean Twedt / Elliot Weinstein vs Thomas Diggins / David Fisher6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-30vs UPTA65C/Wright/BrookstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesRalph Mosca / Elliot Weinstein vs Earl Claypool / Terry Orr7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLarry Wingard / David Pontell vs David Brooks / Roger Kanaan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Woerz / Tom Prala vs Thomas Diggins / David Fisher2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65+ Combo Men - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA65C/Woerz/Keowee Key000000
2UPTA65C/Wright/Brookstone000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
John Aylor
published
3.36
Ralph Mosca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Dean Twedt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
David Pontell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Wilson Craft
published
3.12
Larry Wingard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Stephen Woerz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Elliot Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Tom Prala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
William Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Wingard + Dean Twedt5263% games+8.7% vs expected
Dean Twedt + David Pontell2345% gamesnot enough data
Larry Wingard + David Pontell314 matchesnot enough data
Larry Wingard + Stephen Woerz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Aylor
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Ralph Mosca
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Dean Twedt
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3
David Pontell
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Wilson Craft
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Larry Wingard
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Stephen Woerz
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Elliot Weinstein
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Tom Prala
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
William Robertson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.