Teams

UPTA65C/Wright/Brookstone

2026 UPTA Combo 65 & Over - SC · 65+ Combo Men - 6.5

7 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Performance Tennis at Brookstone Meadows
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Douglas Wright
Sep 27 1:00 PM
Douglas Wright
2026-09-01vs UPTA65C/Woerz/Keowee KeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Brock / Terry Orr vs Ralph Mosca / Brett Kreisher3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEarl Claypool / Rickey Bridges vs Larry Wingard / David Pontell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Diggins / David Fisher vs Dean Twedt / Elliot Weinstein4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-30vs UPTA65C/Woerz/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesEarl Claypool / Terry Orr vs Ralph Mosca / Elliot Weinstein5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Brooks / Roger Kanaan vs Larry Wingard / David Pontell4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Diggins / David Fisher vs Stephen Woerz / Tom Prala6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65+ Combo Men - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA65C/Woerz/Keowee Key000000
2UPTA65C/Wright/Brookstone000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Tom Sunshine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Rickey Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Michael Drosieko
published
2.95
Roger Kanaan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Greg Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Earl Claypool
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Diggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Drosieko + Roger Kanaan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Sunshine
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Rickey Bridges
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Michael Drosieko
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Roger Kanaan
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
Greg Brock
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Earl Claypool
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Diggins
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.