Teams

MD.Ligay

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllie Ligay / Cait Bauer vs Sydney Rushing / Desiree Evans6-2, 6-0
2024-04-21vs TOC.KempfWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllie Ligay / Paige Jennings vs Laurie Reiss / Lisa Kempf3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCait Bauer / Becky King vs Camille Conzola / Nicole Peterson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Jennifer Moses vs Catherine Taylor / Kari Barsness6-2, 7-5
2024-04-14vs PW.KraftWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth McKinley / Cait Bauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Moses / Brooke Rawls vs Penny Kraft / Stephanie Pucci2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-07vs TING.StarrittLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Reiser / Cait Bauer vs Connie Kim / Olga Tiselsky6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKatherine Henry / Brooke Rawls vs Bich Trigilio / Jennifer Kuzma0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Stephanie Wright vs Terry Perrone / Angela Ray6-7, 4-6
2024-03-17vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Alicia Fitzpatrick6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-18vs TOC.EvansSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Sydney Rushing5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky King / Brooke Rawls vs Desiree Evans / Jessenia Delos Santos7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Mollie McCauley
published
3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.53
Cait Bauer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Katherine Henry
published
3.43
Casey Hale
published 3.5
3.43
Donna Reiser
published
3.35
Virginia Lewis
published
3.17
Jennifer Moses
published
3.10
Brooke Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Beth McKinley
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Lewis + Donna Reiser2348% gamesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Cait Bauer314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Katherine Henry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie McCauley
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Cait Bauer
86W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Katherine Henry
21W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Casey Hale
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Donna Reiser
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Virginia Lewis
28W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Jennifer Moses
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Brooke Rawls
196W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Beth McKinley
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.