Teams

TOC.Evans

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-21vs MD.LigaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilda Eade / Najia Cheema vs Katherine Henry / Casey Hale5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessenia Delos Santos / Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales vs Becky King / Carolyn Ulrich4-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessenia Delos Santos / Wilda Eade vs Ronna Yates / Stephanie Pucci1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-28vs TOC.KempfLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilda Eade / Jessenia Delos Santos vs Camille Conzola / Catherine Taylor6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-14vs TING.StarrittLost 01
L#1 DoublesOmojojadavwe Suzette Morales / Natasha Tyson vs Jennifer Lefebvre / Karen Reynders0-6, 5-7
2024-03-10vs TOC.KempfLost 01
L#3 DoublesNajia Cheema / Wilda Eade vs Lauren Triebert / Marina Barthalmus5-7, 4-6
2024-03-03vs PW.KraftWon 10
W#2 DoublesOmojojadavwe Suzette Morales / Stephanie Jabusch vs Priya Desai / Ally Setliff5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-25vs TING.StarrittLost 02
L#1 DoublesOmojojadavwe Suzette Morales / Natasha Tyson vs Jennifer Lefebvre / Karen Reynders6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDesiree Evans / Wilda Eade vs Tiffany Eastley / Suzanne Jeska0-6, 1-6
2024-02-18vs MD.LigayLost 01
L#1 DoublesOmojojadavwe Suzette Morales / Wilda Eade vs Beth McKinley / Amy Rogers7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Najia Cheema
published
3.31
Emily Yang
published
3.01
Wilda Eade
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
published
2.89
Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wilda Eade + Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Najia Cheema
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Emily Yang
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Wilda Eade
38W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Stephanie Jabusch
22W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales
57W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Jessenia Delos Santos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.