Teams

TOC.Sodem

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-05vs TOC.YadavLost 01
L#2 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Kiran Ramaswamy7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-11-14vs TOC.SmithWon 10
W#1 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Christopher Shelton6-3, 6-3
2023-11-07vs TOHS.ByrdLost 01
L#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Nicholas Lau3-6, 4-6
2023-10-24vs TOC.MoyungWon 10
W#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Christopher Green7-5, 7-5
2023-10-22vs TOC.CapobiancoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSantha Perian vs Matthew Capobianco2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Shawn Hallin6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-17vs LOCH.ReynoldsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Enric Prat Codina6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesManikandan Subramanian vs Kevin Mcdonald0-6, 1-6
2023-10-10vs MVL.HariharanLost 01
L#2 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Deepak Jayashankaran1-6, 0-6
2023-10-03vs TOC.SheppardLost 12
W#1 SinglesSantha Perian vs Ryan Sheppard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesManikandan Subramanian vs Sergii Porokh5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Raymond Xu3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Santha Perian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Sathisha Kumar
usually #3 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.87
Chris Culver
published 4
3.84
Manikandan Subramanian
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Ramana Sodem
published
3.37
Seshagiri Kalluru
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Santha Perian + Sathisha Kumar4260% games+8.3% vs expected
Sathisha Kumar + Manikandan Subramanian4261% gamesnot enough data
Santha Perian + Manikandan Subramanian224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Santha Perian
210W–109L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Sathisha Kumar
143W–107L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Chris Culver
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4.5
Manikandan Subramanian
55W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.84
Ramana Sodem
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Seshagiri Kalluru
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.