Teams

TOC.Yadav

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-05vs TOC.SodemWon 10
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Sathisha Kumar5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-14vs MVL.HariharanLost 02
L#1 SinglesPraveen Yadav vs Chirag Patel5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Uday Parikh0-6, 1-6
2023-11-07vs TOC.SheppardLost 12
L#1 SinglesPraveen Yadav vs Jack Hu6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Aaron Heil3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Raymond Xu6-2, 6-4
2023-10-24vs TOC.CapobiancoLost 12
L#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Shawn Hallin4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Karan Mehra6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPraveen Yadav vs Balaji Radhakrishnan6-2, 6-1
2023-10-17vs TOC.SmithWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Tyler Smith6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Brian Dorais7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Brent Hilsabeck6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-10vs TOHS.ByrdLost 02
L#2 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs William Clark4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPraveen Yadav vs Migel Hidalgo Saldana2-6, 3-6
2023-09-26vs TOC.MoyungSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Kevin Moyung2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Evan Pozzanghera1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-19vs LOCH.ReynoldsLost 12
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Enric Prat Codina6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Layton Barker1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Scott Anderson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.73
Praveen Yadav
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Kiran Ramaswamy15854% games+0.4% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Praveen Yadav5545% games−6.7% vs expected
Praveen Yadav + Kiran Ramaswamy2446% games−9.8% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil6252% gamesnot enough data
Praveen Yadav + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil5356% gamesnot enough data
Kiran Ramaswamy + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil6261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
4
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
200W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.11
4
Praveen Yadav
166W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.