Teams

NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0M

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-06vs NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Widener / Joey Pollom vs Peter Martin / Roger Prucino4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRon Samples / Mark Friedman vs David Harnick / David Lee6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKevin Roessler / Keith Roessler vs Stephen Post / Robert Johnston7-6, 6-3
2024-06-25vs NNM 8.0M Min-JCWon 21
W#1 DoublesEli Lee / Joey Pollom vs Kurt Kunzler / Mark Carlisle6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Roessler / Keith Roessler vs Daniel McClanahan / Mike Rising6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPete Henderson / Ron Samples vs Yongseek Kim / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min6-7, 4-6
2024-06-19vs NNM 8.0M Gee-LoboWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoey Pollom / Ron Samples vs Javier Gonzales / Leon Redman6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Friendly / Ran Bang vs Kevin Wiley / Bryan Oliver6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPete Henderson / Eli Lee vs Richard Barker / James Gee1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-17vs NNM 8.0M Gee-LoboWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Friedman / Ran Bang vs Javier Gonzales / Scott Jamison6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoey Pollom / Ron Samples vs Kevin Wiley / Leon Redman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEli Lee / Patrick Widener vs Jerome Romero / Richard Barker6-0, 7-6
2024-06-10vs NNM 8.0M Martello-HPWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoey Pollom / Benjamin Friendly vs Tim Sander / Kenneth Harper6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Roessler / Keith Roessler vs James Topmiller / Peter Korsan6-3, 6-4
2024-06-05vs NNM 8.0M Martello-HPWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Oldfield / Ran Bang vs James Topmiller / Peter Korsan6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Joey Pollom vs Roy McKinney / Larry Schneider6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKevin Roessler / Keith Roessler vs Tim Sander / Kenneth Harper6-0, 6-4
2024-06-03vs NNM 8.0M Min-JCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoey Pollom / Benjamin Friendly vs Jae Lee / Alan Blair6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Eli Lee vs Yongseek Kim / John Wills6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPete Henderson / Patrick Widener vs Kurt Kunzler / Mark Carlisle6-4, 6-3
2024-06-01vs NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWCWon 20
W#2 DoublesKeith Roessler / Kevin Roessler vs Robert Johnston / Scot McDermott7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRan Bang / Ron Oldfield vs Roger Prucino / David Harnick6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0M802049158
2NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWC5216515154
3NNM 8.0M Min-JC35111329234
4NNM 8.0M Martello-HP2561534228
5NNM 8.0M Gee-Lobo1742043267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Benjamin Friendly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Ron Oldfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Keith Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Joey Pollom
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.85
Kevin Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Ran Bang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Ron Samples
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Pete Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eli Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patrick Sullivan
published
Patrick Widener
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Samples + Patrick Widener7365% games+17.8% vs expected
Benjamin Friendly + Ron Oldfield6259% games+4.3% vs expected
Ron Samples + Patrick Sullivan6165% games+4.1% vs expected
Kevin Roessler + Keith Roessler585051% games−0.9% vs expected
Patrick Sullivan + Patrick Widener4453% gamesnot enough data
Ron Oldfield + Pete Henderson224 matchesnot enough data
Ron Oldfield + Patrick Widener134 matchesnot enough data
Ron Samples + Eli Lee314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Friendly
70W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.94
Ron Oldfield
131W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
Keith Roessler
107W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
Joey Pollom
178W–132L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
Kevin Roessler
78W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
Ran Bang
73W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Ron Samples
153W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Pete Henderson
73W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Eli Lee
49W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Sullivan
85W–50L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Widener
49W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.