Teams

NNM 8.0M Min-JC

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-13vs NNM 8.0M Gee-LoboWon 30
W#1 DoublesHyeung-Sik Jason Min / Yongseek Kim vs Javier Gonzales / Scott Jamison6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMike Rising / Daniel McClanahan vs Bryan Oliver / Alan Zampini6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlan Blair / David Walsh vs Jerome Romero / James Gee6-3, 6-3
2024-07-07vs NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHyeung-Sik Jason Min / Mark Carlisle vs Stephen Post / Peter Martin3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Jae Lee vs Michael Fugate / David Lee1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Rising / John Wills vs Frederick Ellis / Paul Wantuck7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-03vs NNM 8.0M Martello-HPWon 30
W#1 DoublesHyeung-Sik Jason Min / Mark Carlisle vs Tim Sander / James Topmiller6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Walsh / John Wills vs Ty Martello / Greg Fotieo6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlan Blair / Jae Lee vs Larry Schneider / Mike Murphy6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-30vs NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Walsh / Kurt Kunzler vs Peter Martin / Roger Prucino6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHyeung-Sik Jason Min / Yongseek Kim vs David Lee / Scot McDermott7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJae Lee / Mike Rising vs Paul Wantuck / Frederick Ellis1-6, 3-6
2024-06-25vs NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Mark Carlisle vs Eli Lee / Joey Pollom3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel McClanahan / Mike Rising vs Kevin Roessler / Keith Roessler1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesYongseek Kim / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Pete Henderson / Ron Samples7-6, 6-4
2024-06-08vs NNM 8.0M Gee-LoboWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Carlisle / Yongseek Kim vs Scott Jamison / Leon Redman6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Walsh / John Wills vs Robert Hwang / Kevin Wiley6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlan Blair / Daniel McClanahan vs Richard Barker / James Gee6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-06-03vs NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJae Lee / Alan Blair vs Joey Pollom / Benjamin Friendly2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYongseek Kim / John Wills vs Patrick Sullivan / Eli Lee3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Mark Carlisle vs Pete Henderson / Patrick Widener4-6, 3-6
2024-05-29vs NNM 8.0M Martello-HPLost 02
L#1 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Mark Carlisle vs Peter Korsan / James Topmiller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Wills / Daniel McClanahan vs Greg Fotieo / Tim Sander2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0M802049158
2NNM/Martin/55 & Over/8.0MWC5216515154
3NNM 8.0M Min-JC35111329234
4NNM 8.0M Martello-HP2561534228
5NNM 8.0M Gee-Lobo1742043267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Yongseek Kim
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
John Wills
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
David Walsh
published 4
3.73
Mark Carlisle
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.70
Stephen Madeyski
published
3.65
Hyeung-Sik Jason Min
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.64
Kurt Kunzler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.62
Alan Blair
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Daniel McClanahan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Mike Rising
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hyeung-Sik Jason Min + Yongseek Kim15656% games+2.0% vs expected
Kurt Kunzler + Stephen Madeyski2648% games+0.3% vs expected
Kurt Kunzler + Hyeung-Sik Jason Min4353% games−5.4% vs expected
Kurt Kunzler + Mark Carlisle1639% games−10.2% vs expected
Mike Rising + Daniel McClanahan2333% gamesnot enough data
Mark Carlisle + Hyeung-Sik Jason Min2348% gamesnot enough data
Daniel McClanahan + David Walsh314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Carlisle + Stephen Madeyski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yongseek Kim
52W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
John Wills
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
David Walsh
22W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Carlisle
61W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Stephen Madeyski
59W–63L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Hyeung-Sik Jason Min
101W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Kurt Kunzler
83W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Alan Blair
79W–95L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Daniel McClanahan
73W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Mike Rising
35W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.