Teams

Winner/Veltri/Wank

2026 Broward Adult ESL 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.06 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-12vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineWon 10
W#1 DoublesClarena Furtado / Lorena Villar vs Robin Hayden / Hermine Greene6-1, 6-2
2025-11-23vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineWon 20
W#2 DoublesClarena Furtado / Cristina Tomadin vs Maria Elena Rojas / Alicia Dominguez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorena Villar / Shari Silver vs Robin Hayden / Mirella Sprinckmoller6-4, 6-4
2025-11-16vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineWon 20
W#2 DoublesSigal Sasson / Kumiko Currie vs Edith Schmidt / Alicia Dominguez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVeronica Wank / Ina Gluck vs Maria Elena Rojas / Hermine Greene6-2, 6-3
2025-11-15vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesShari Silver / Veronica Wank vs Maria Brozzi / Edith Schmidt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKumiko Currie / Sigal Sasson vs Maria Elena Rojas / Hermine Greene6-2, 6-1
2025-11-02vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineWon 20
W#1 DoublesClarena Furtado / Cristina Tomadin vs Rose Haney / Maria Brozzi6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVeronica Wank / Ina Gluck vs Alicia Dominguez / Robin Hayden6-1, 6-0
2025-10-26vs MissionBay/PrimeTimers/LevineWon 10
W#3 DoublesShari Silver / Veronica Wank vs Hermine Greene / Maria Elena Rojas6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winner/Veltri/Wank5114410112
2MissionBay/PrimeTimers/Levine1541430203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Sharon Runk
published 4.5
4.22
Kumiko Currie
published
4.05
Jill Rickey
published 4.5
3.79
Lorena Villar
published 4
3.79
Veronica Wank
published 4
3.77
Cristina Tomadin
published 4
3.74
Clarena Furtado
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Kim Brown
published
3.69
Shari Silver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Lori Paglini
published 4
3.56
Sigal Sasson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Ana Pastorino
published 3.5
3.07
Theresa Caruso
published
Ina Gluck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorena Villar + Shari Silver10263% games+5.5% vs expected
Sigal Sasson + Shari Silver3450% games+5.2% vs expected
Sharon Runk + Veronica Wank7264% games+4.9% vs expected
Cristina Tomadin + Clarena Furtado6556% games+0.1% vs expected
Lori Paglini + Kim Brown101150% games−3.2% vs expected
Theresa Caruso + Ana Pastorino6846% games−4.7% vs expected
Cristina Tomadin + Veronica Wank4844% games−16.5% vs expected
Cristina Tomadin + Lorena Villar8853% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sharon Runk
136W–57L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
Kumiko Currie
111W–81L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Jill Rickey
109W–122L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Veronica Wank
148W–154L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cristina Tomadin
266W–200L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Brown
11W–18L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Shari Silver
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Lori Paglini
56W–76L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
Sigal Sasson
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Ana Pastorino
288W–153L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Theresa Caruso
98W–182L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Ina Gluck
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.