Teams

UPTA18A/Russell/Kroc

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Men - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-15vs UPTA18A/Schneider/Neely FarmWon 32
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Hampton Williams vs Kit Alewine / Michael Sherman0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNathaniel Futral vs Mike Wise0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Shoultz / Peter Elbaum vs Jeff Greenstreet / Doug Keel6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDrew Corontzes vs Richard Gajewski6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Helms / Andrew Morrison vs Kenneth Hoyer / David Allen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Andrew Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Chris Helms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Douglas Meagher
published
3.60
Drew Corontzes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.55
Peter Elbaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jivan Dave
published
3.39
Jonathan Shoultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Kevin Turner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Patrick OFriel
published
3.21
Sidney Key
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Nathaniel Futral
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.93
Erik Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Dev Vaz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Russell + Nathaniel Futral4352% games+19.5% vs expected
Erik Russell + Sidney Key1544% games+14.1% vs expected
Kevin Turner + Erik Russell123 matchesnot enough data
Erik Russell + Jonathan Shoultz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Morrison
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Chris Helms
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Douglas Meagher
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
Drew Corontzes
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Peter Elbaum
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Jivan Dave
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jonathan Shoultz
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kevin Turner
59W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Patrick OFriel
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Sidney Key
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Nathaniel Futral
21W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Erik Russell
11W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Dev Vaz
2W–8L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.