Teams

TOC.Schloemann

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-17vs TOC.WilsonWon 20
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Emily Johnson6-2, 7-6
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Lauren Triebert6-2, 6-1
2022-08-12vs TOC.SziksaiWon 10
W#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Betsy Shane6-3, 7-6
2022-08-02vs TOC.WilsonWon 10
W#3 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Lauren Triebert6-1, 6-2
2022-07-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Emily Kendall4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Beth Crompton7-5
2022-06-28Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Carolyn Lee3-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs TOC.SziksaiLost 01
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Anna Tomkins1-6, 2-6
2022-05-31Won 10
W#3 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
3.77
Jamie Middledorf
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.59
Rebekah Schloemann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.54
Meghan Rider
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4
Paige Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Rider + Rebekah Schloemann3553% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Jenkins
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.85
4
Jamie Middledorf
140W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Rebekah Schloemann
99W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Meghan Rider
342W–169L career · 7 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Paige Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.