Teams

TOC.Sziksai

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Kimberly Romoda6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKimberly Hilt vs Laura Ross6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-10Split 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Carrie Guthrie6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesXylena Simone Sziksai vs Laura Ross1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-08-03vs MD.CoxSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Beth Crompton6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKimberly Hilt vs Christine Reinke1-6, 3-6
2022-07-20vs TOC.WilsonWon 10
W#3 SinglesErin Swindell vs Lauren Triebert6-4, 6-4
2022-07-01vs MD.CoxWon 21
L#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Ira Duarte5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesXylena Simone Sziksai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesButton Hall vs Christine Reinke3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-21vs TOC.WilsonLost 12
L#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Nikki DAmbrose4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesXylena Simone Sziksai vs Tatiana Nevmyrych2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesKimberly Hilt vs Emily Childs3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-07vs TOC.SchloemannWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Meghan Rider6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesErin Swindell vs Paige Jennings6-4, 6-3
2022-05-31vs TOC.WilsonSplit 11
L#2 SinglesErin Swindell vs Nikki DAmbrose7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKimberly Hilt vs Emily Kendall6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.76
Erin Swindell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Stephanie Disbrow
published
3.60
Button Hall
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 4
3.58
Xylena Simone Sziksai
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.52
Betsy Shane
published 4
3.50
Kimberly Hilt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Swindell + Stephanie Disbrow4646% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Erin Swindell
166W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Stephanie Disbrow
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 7 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Xylena Simone Sziksai
81W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Betsy Shane
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kimberly Hilt
350W–172L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.