Teams

ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cybille Scott
published 4
3.81
Kathryn Venezia
published
3.73
Anne Poirier
published 4
3.36
3.30
Farrell Pappas
published
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.26
Suzanne Peck
published
3.25
Shirley Coke
published
3.21
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.13
Rebecca Bergman
published
3.00
Mickie Kerr
published
2.91
Mimi Cattermole
published
Lisa Bloom
published
Margaret Simor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cybille Scott + Mimi Cattermole123 matchesnot enough data
Cybille Scott + Anne Poirier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cybille Scott
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Kathryn Venezia
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Anne Poirier
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Farrell Pappas
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Shirley Coke
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Nanny Tunnell
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Rebecca Bergman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Mimi Cattermole
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lisa Bloom
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Simor
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.