← Search

Margaret Simor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alamo, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history57 matches
L
2026-04-14 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tena Carter
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerry Marx
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-05-14 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Coke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-03-30 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-11-03 · ROUND HILL CC CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kirsten Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-27 · ROUND HILL CC CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Dunlap
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-09-15 · ROUND HILL CC CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Dunlap
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-22 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jana Vojdani
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
W
2024-05-19 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smith
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-04-29 · ROUND HILL CC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-04-21 · ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Peloquin
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-31 · ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Bauer
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.2% of games
6.5
20%
2W–8L · 42.2% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert