Teams

LCTA18/Miller/Hamlin

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5 Day

16 players · average NTRP 2.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Kimberleigh Booros
published
Gigi Thompson
published 3
2.59
Jennifer Mather
published
2.57
Kristin Cheeseman
published
2.51
Penny Portman
published
2.48
Deena Hofstetter
published 3
2.47
Susan Hancock
published
2.34
Charlene Vaughn
published 3
2.34
Debbie Avinger
published 2.5
2.29
Sudie Sullivan
published
2.27
Emily Ulrich
published 2.5
Barbara Pace
published 2.5
2.21
Carole Deerin
published 2.5
2.06
Karen Massarotti
published
Linda Carlson
published
Youmna Squalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hancock + Debbie Avinger2550% games+6.0% vs expected
Penny Portman + Sudie Sullivan2345% games+3.7% vs expected
Kristin Cheeseman + Debbie Avinger102839% games−4.5% vs expected
Emily Ulrich + Susan Hancock3254% gamesnot enough data
Emily Ulrich + Penny Portman3252% gamesnot enough data
Emily Ulrich + Sudie Sullivan0536% gamesnot enough data
Susan Hancock + Linda Carlson1440% gamesnot enough data
Susan Hancock + Deena Hofstetter1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberleigh Booros
95W–78L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Gigi Thompson
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Mather
33W–39L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
2.59
Kristin Cheeseman
16W–41L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57
Penny Portman
44W–56L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Deena Hofstetter
38W–85L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48
Susan Hancock
28W–65L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Charlene Vaughn
11W–37L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34
2.5
Debbie Avinger
32W–83L career · no lines in 2022
0%89%11%
2.34
Sudie Sullivan
15W–51L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.29
2.5
Emily Ulrich
22W–58L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Barbara Pace
8W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Carole Deerin
11W–21L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21
Karen Massarotti
19W–46L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.06
Linda Carlson
17W–54L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Youmna Squalli
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.