Teams

Pelican Marsh / Eldredge

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-27vs Island Walk / SchmidtLost 01
L#2 DoublesNila Gray / Janine Molloy vs Patty McManus / Linda Orlich7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRosie Renfro / Cindy Leiding vs Lynn Damico / Clarissa Valdivia2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanine Molloy / Barbara Seymour vs Terina Korda / Deborah Paller3-6, 3-6
2025-01-30vs Olde Cypress / NavarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllyson Schillinger / Rosie Renfro vs Michelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller1-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs Island Walk / SchmidtLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanine Molloy / Stephanie Eldredge vs Linda Santo / Christine Cornish2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Helena Roeper
published 4
3.85
Fiona Prentice
published 4
3.34
Barbara Seymour
published 3.5
3.33
Allyson Schillinger
published 3.5
3.25
Cathy Arnold
published 3.5
3.18
Gail Oroho
published 3.5
3.12
Tonja Dahm
published
3.12
Janine Molloy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.72
Helen Sharp
published 3
Margaret Caccia
published
Maureen Ferguson
published
Nancy Colan
published
Nila Gray
published
Rosie Renfro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rosita Gilsenan
published
Stephanie Eldredge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nila Gray + Allyson Schillinger3351% gamesnot enough data
Tonja Dahm + Nancy Colan3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helena Roeper
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Fiona Prentice
33W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Barbara Seymour
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Allyson Schillinger
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cathy Arnold
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gail Oroho
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Tonja Dahm
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Janine Molloy
69W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Helen Sharp
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Margaret Caccia
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Ferguson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Colan
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nila Gray
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosie Renfro
36W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosita Gilsenan
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Eldredge
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.