Teams

Olde Cypress / Navarro

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-03-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Farmer / Susanne Navarro vs Barbara Fortunato / Brenda Rhoda7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-06vs Pelican Marsh / EldredgeWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Michelle Maggal vs Allyson Schillinger / Nila Gray5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Raymond / Diana Heckert vs Julie Smith / Cindy Leiding6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Marketa Dieckmann vs Helen Sharp / Maureen Ferguson6-3, 6-3
2025-03-03vs Grey Oaks / RomanoLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Kathleen Farmer vs Marie Wilson / Monica Callaghan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Angela Whinyates vs Debra Gardner Hussey / Christine Carter2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesNancy Raymond / Kathleen Iverson vs Elsie Jerozal / Deborah Paller6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Michelle Maggal vs Katherine MacWilliams / Sara Garrett1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJean Barry / Susanne Navarro vs Clarissa Valdivia / Lynn Damico6-7, 4-6
2025-02-17vs Lighthouse Bay / BroihanWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Kathleen Farmer vs Robin Inscho / Lesleigh Barnett2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-13vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Heckert / Kathleen Iverson vs Elise Kauder / Laura Haney3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Jean Barry vs Linda Orlich / Judith Davis6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Cheryl Toth vs Linda Santo / Sue Schmidt6-1, 6-2
2025-02-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Diana Heckert vs Lauren Keillor / Brenda Rhoda6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-06vs Heritage Bay / K. KeillorLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Brenda Bensmiller vs Gina Mishler / Kimberly Martin1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Marketa Dieckmann vs Lisa Palmeri / Annette McCann4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAngela Aline / Diana Heckert vs Linda Lynch / Maria Lichterman6-2, 6-1
2025-01-30vs Pelican Marsh / EldredgeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller vs Allyson Schillinger / Rosie Renfro6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Nancy Raymond vs Margaret Caccia / Cathy Arnold6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Heckert / Libby Eckert vs Julie Smith / Gail Oroho4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Marketa Dieckmann vs Terina Korda / Clarissa Valdivia6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Nancy Raymond vs Deborah Paller / Katherine MacWilliams6-2, 6-2
2025-01-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Barbara Dillon vs Emily Dunn / Mary Conversano4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Angela Springer vs Paula Hinegardner / Laura King7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-01-09vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Cheryl Toth vs Laura Haney / Sara Martineson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Jean Barry vs Linda Santo / Elise Kauder7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Aline / Michelle Maggal vs Linda Orlich / Patty McManus3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Nancy Raymond
published
3.43
Diana Heckert
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.33
Kathleen Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Brenda Bensmiller
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.24
Angela Aline
published 3.5
3.09
Libby Eckert
published
Linda Boyd
published
Marketa Dieckmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Iverson + Nancy Raymond9254% games+1.8% vs expected
Brenda Bensmiller + Michelle Maggal191655% games−8.8% vs expected
Michelle Maggal + Susanne Navarro5257% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Iverson + Diana Heckert5160% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Bensmiller + Susanne Navarro2347% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Maggal + Marketa Dieckmann314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Iverson + Michelle Maggal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Raymond
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Diana Heckert
165W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Brenda Bensmiller
64W–84L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Angela Aline
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Libby Eckert
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Linda Boyd
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marketa Dieckmann
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.