Teams

Serve It Up

2026 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-05vs Three's CompanyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Stuart / Ingrid Heinze vs Hannah Santiago / Zdenka Edgar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Martinez / Sylvia Garza vs Diana Garcia / Margaret Chavez6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesErika Ganey / Nolette Brell vs Shannon Wagner / Marissa Kenisky6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Shavano Lethal LadiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Maddox / Angela Avila vs Rena Nance / Nicole Gradeless6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Jacob / Tzu-Ting Anna Chen vs Dennie Huchingson / Lilya Matos6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMonica Kosta / Nolette Brell vs Gina Jones / Heather Wilkinson1-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs Tri-HarderLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Maddox / Tzu-Ting Anna Chen vs Jamie Shomette / Eileen Vogt1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Martinez / Sylvia Garza vs Erin Robinson / Nicole Donoso3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Samelson Massiatte / Judy Cooper vs Lindsey Musch / Nicole Gallegos7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-03vs TRI AGAINLost 12
W#1 DoublesDawn Stuart / Ingrid Heinze vs Wendi Kaplan / Elizabeth Vice6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIsabel Garcia / Julie Jacob vs Michelle Pettit / Kerry Napper2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Cooper / Sharon Samelson Massiatte vs Amy Carson / Kelly McAlear1-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs Racq PacqLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Avila / Melissa Maddox vs Judy Sotelo / Joanne Sundin6-2, 1-1
L#2 DoublesTina Yee / Debbie Sumpter vs Noemi Copeland / Christie Golla1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Samelson Massiatte / Monica Kosta vs Kara Mushrush / Lidiane Bridges4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Angela Avila
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.79
Ingrid Heinze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Melissa Maddox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Dawn Stuart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Sylvia Garza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Tzu-Ting Anna Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Isabel Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Debbie Sumpter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Tina Yee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Nolette Brell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Erika Ganey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Monica Kosta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sharon Samelson Massiatte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Judy Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Stuart + Ingrid Heinze141650% games+4.0% vs expected
Isabel Garcia + Tina Yee1632% games−16.6% vs expected
Erika Ganey + Isabel Garcia134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Sumpter + Nolette Brell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Avila
36W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Ingrid Heinze
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Melissa Maddox
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dawn Stuart
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Sylvia Garza
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Tzu-Ting Anna Chen
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Isabel Garcia
4W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Debbie Sumpter
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tina Yee
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Nolette Brell
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3.5
Erika Ganey
8W–17L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Monica Kosta
10W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Sharon Samelson Massiatte
2W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Judy Cooper
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.