Teams

Love Hurts

2026 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-09vs Hit and RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Eisele / Nick Eisele vs Ted Wagner / Sonia Ivanova2-6, 1-6
2026-04-25vs Serve Mix-a-LotLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Eisele / Nick Eisele vs Carrie Fischer / Jake Riehemann1-6, 0-6
2026-03-28vs The IncrediblesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSimhachalam Pilla / Julie Eisele vs John Kopplin / ADRA KIPPER6-7, 5-7
2026-03-22vs Love Bites 2026Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNick Eisele / Julie Eisele vs Timothy Brown / Alaina Sayers1-6, 0-6
2026-03-07vs Mister and Miss HitsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Eisele / Nick Eisele vs Christeena Sevy / Adam Bridges3-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs GreyhoundsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Eisele / Cliff Johnson vs Luke Felt / Kristina Kingery3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Justin Smith
published 4
3.21
Will Hunter
published 3.5
3.20
Brad Elfman
published 3.5
3.19
Katherine Frisk
published 3.5
3.17
Cliff Johnson
published 3.5
3.15
Rachel Boren
published 3.5
3.12
Shawna Ianson
published 3.5
3.05
Simhachalam Pilla
published 3.5
3.02
2.99
Cathy Johnson
published 3
Julie Eisele
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Eisele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Boren + Brad Elfman2347% games+3.1% vs expected
Katherine Frisk + Will Hunter4355% games+0.1% vs expected
Cathy Johnson + Cliff Johnson2448% gamesnot enough data
Shawna Ianson + Justin Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Nick Eisele + Julie Eisele044 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Clift-French + Will Hunter033 matchesnot enough data
Simhachalam Pilla + Katherine Frisk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Smith
23W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
3.5
Will Hunter
9W–18L career · type T · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brad Elfman
52W–55L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Katherine Frisk
67W–64L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cliff Johnson
39W–26L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Rachel Boren
146W–192L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Shawna Ianson
92W–114L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Simhachalam Pilla
101W–111L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Rebecca Clift-French
78W–125L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Cathy Johnson
16W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Julie Eisele
47W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nick Eisele
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.