Teams

Glenmore-Touzalin/Liebenow

2023 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-17vs ACAC Dare Doubles-BaylissLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Haney / Carol Haig vs Leslie Mcdonald / Courtney Heyward4-6, 3-6
2023-10-15vs BHSC-PhillipsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Haney / Donna Horn vs Taylor Kelley / Jill Lerner1-6, 4-6
2023-10-10vs Tri To Beat Us-DivitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haney / Laura Leetzow vs Noel Jorgensen / Stephanie Hall3-6, 1-6
2023-09-24vs ACAC Net-Gain-SimonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Liebenow / Debbie Lonnquest vs Jan Carroll / Kelli Wood7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-19vs ACAC Dare Doubles-BaylissWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Liebenow / Debbie Lonnquest vs Susan Bayliss / Sarah Caldwell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
2.96
Debbie Lonnquest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Catherine Haney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Dalton Dorne
published 3
Donna Horn
published 3
2.69
Jane Touzalin
published
2.68
Nerissa Rouzer
published
2.45
Patricia Clifford
published
Christine Faulkner
published 2.5
2.07
Kathleen Edwards
published
Marcy MacGovern
published
Rebecca Bushey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Edwards + Nerissa Rouzer5156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Debbie Lonnquest
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Catherine Haney
39W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dalton Dorne
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Donna Horn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Touzalin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
Nerissa Rouzer
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%8%92%
2.68
Patricia Clifford
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Christine Faulkner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Edwards
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Marcy MacGovern
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Bushey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.