Teams

ACAC Net-Gain-Simon

2023 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-24vs Glenmore-Touzalin/LiebenowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJan Carroll / Jenny Furlow vs Laura Leetzow / Marcy MacGovern5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ensminger / Ann Hague vs Rebecca Bushey / Christine Faulkner6-3, 6-2
2023-10-15vs Farmington-FaulconerWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Hague / Christina Meyer vs Lauretta Harbilas / Caroline Childers6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-25vs BHSC-PhillipsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Furlow / Kathy Huddleston vs Diane Burns / Silvia Blemker6-0, 6-2
2023-09-24vs Glenmore-Touzalin/LiebenowWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Hague / Christina Meyer vs Andrea Richardson / Rebecca Bushey6-2, 6-2
2023-09-21vs Tri To Beat Us-DivitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Corradino / Jenny Furlow vs Susie Abramson / Judith Divita6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jenny Furlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kelli Wood
published
2.96
Christina Meyer
published 3
2.75
Jan Carroll
published 3
2.69
Belinda Prittie
published 3
2.64
Diane Simon
published 3
2.57
Patricia Foley
published
2.56
Blair Hubbard
published 3
2.11
Ann Hague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Wendi Cook
published
Linda Corradino
published
Martha Donnelly
published
Mary Ensminger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Belinda Prittie + Patricia Foley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jenny Furlow
144W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.55
Kelli Wood
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Christina Meyer
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Jan Carroll
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Belinda Prittie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Diane Simon
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
Patricia Foley
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Blair Hubbard
27W–61L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Ann Hague
27W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Wendi Cook
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Linda Corradino
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Donnelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ensminger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.