Teams

Farmington-Faulconer

2023 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.06 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-29vs BHSC-PhillipsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Lord / Loring Woodriff vs Taylor Kelley / Abbie Oliver1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-17vs BHSC-CooperLost 02
L#2 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Shannon Mrazik vs Julie McCulloch / Megan Wyant2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Ann Hay Hardy vs Maggie Moore / Leigh Rinckel2-6, 4-6
2023-10-09vs BHSC-PhillipsLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlicia Murphy / Loring Woodriff vs Pascale Hapgood / Taylor Kelley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Lauretta Harbilas vs Bunny French / Susie Jones1-6, 5-7
2023-10-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Patti Pate vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-24vs Tri To Beat Us-DivitaWon 10
W#3 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Ann Hay Hardy vs Shauna Hogg / Tamara Murray6-2, 6-2
2023-09-12vs BHSC-CooperLost 01
L#3 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Gina Senese vs Stephanie Radlick / Kailey Boatright4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Penny Ward
published
3.17
Anne Barger
published 3.5
2.92
Loring Woodriff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Jenn Crutchfield Worth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Jill Lord
published
Dianna Gibson
published 3
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Katie Cowen
published
2.70
Alicia Murphy
published 3
2.56
2.56
Shannon Mrazik
published
2.40
Patti Pate
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Ann Hay Hardy + Jenn Crutchfield Worth8258% gamesnot enough data
Loring Woodriff + Jenn Crutchfield Worth314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Ward
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Anne Barger
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Caroline Faulconer Saul
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Jenn Crutchfield Worth
47W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Jill Lord
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dianna Gibson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Cowen
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Alicia Murphy
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Caroline Childers
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
Shannon Mrazik
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Patti Pate
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.