Teams

BHSC-Cooper

2023 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-22vs Tri To Beat Us-DivitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBelinda Blankenship / Maggie Mudd vs Noel Jorgensen / Allison Ewing7-6, 6-2
2023-10-17vs Farmington-FaulconerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Taggart / Melissa Hoover vs Anne Barger / Rebecca Eustis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-10vs ACAC Dare Doubles-BaylissWon 10
W#1 DoublesBelinda Blankenship / Amy Taggart vs Susan Bayliss / Sarah Caldwell7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-24vs BHSC-PhillipsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Taggart / Melissa Hoover vs Lindsay Phillips / Heidi Binko6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-17vs Tri To Beat Us-DivitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Cooper / Amy Taggart vs Allison Ewing / Stephanie Hall6-4, 6-4
2023-09-12vs Farmington-FaulconerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hoover / Belinda Blankenship vs Rebecca Eustis / Penny Ward3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Maggie Moore
published
3.43
Carrie Cooper
published 3.5
3.41
Stephanie Radlick
published
3.33
Maggie Mudd
published
3.26
Melissa Hoover
published
3.22
Belinda Blankenship
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie McCulloch
published
3.14
Megan Wyant
published
3.08
Kailey Boatright
published
2.96
Leigh Rinckel
published
2.92
Linda Jordan
published
2.85
Karen Overman
published
Susan McConnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Cooper + Melissa Hoover4160% games+7.0% vs expected
Belinda Blankenship + Amy Taggart5161% gamesnot enough data
Belinda Blankenship + Carrie Cooper314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carrie Cooper
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Stephanie Radlick
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
Maggie Mudd
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
Melissa Hoover
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Belinda Blankenship
81W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Julie McCulloch
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.16
Megan Wyant
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kailey Boatright
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08
Leigh Rinckel
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Linda Jordan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Karen Overman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Susan McConnell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.