Teams

VC RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-06vs LEBTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Patton / Nancy Fridstein vs Renee Krause / Sarah Veitenhaus7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-30vs CK REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Kane / Kate Patton vs Tamara Donnahoo / Andrea Shearer6-0, 6-0
2023-05-23vs LEBTC GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Kate Patton vs Ann Adams / Julie Horsting4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-16vs GCC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesKate Patton / Kathleen Nisbet vs Deb Ridenour / Amanda Lee6-2, 6-3
2023-05-09vs KC-RH REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Patton / Joanie Mankus vs Leslie Aranjo / Kathleen Antony3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Lauren Andrews
published
2.77
Wendy Serafin
published
2.69
Annie Cordova
published 3
2.44
Kate Patton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.41
Traci Samaras
published 2.5
2.28
Nancy Fridstein
published
2.18
Kathleen Nisbet
published
2.15
Meridith Burrows
published
Joanie Mankus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Samaras + Meridith Burrows4449% games+2.7% vs expected
Annie Cordova + Kate Patton31042% games−4.0% vs expected
Traci Samaras + Kate Patton101152% gamesnot enough data
Traci Samaras + Nancy Fridstein4155% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Joanie Mankus033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Nancy Fridstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Andrews
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Wendy Serafin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Annie Cordova
40W–59L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Kate Patton
72W–120L career · 5 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Traci Samaras
68W–37L career · no lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.41
Nancy Fridstein
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.28
Kathleen Nisbet
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Meridith Burrows
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Joanie Mankus
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.