Teams

KY 5.0W 18 & Over (Fidler)

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & Over LOUISVILLE · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-29vs KY/LOU/MOOREWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Fidler / Taylor Jackson vs Sara Moore / Jennifer Goselin6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachael Lask vs Anne Woosley6-3, 6-3
2026-05-27vs KY/LOU/MOOREWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Kane / Heidi Kane vs Sara Moore / Sarah Jane Dufour7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErin Fidler vs Ellen Stubbs6-1, 6-0
2026-05-17vs KY/LOU/SMITHWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Fidler / Gabrielle Gerlach vs Shannon Lampton / Anna Lask6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesWhitney CollinsThompson vs Paige Gracin6-2, 6-2
2026-05-06vs KY/LOU/SMITHWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Kane / Heidi Kane vs Shannon Lampton / Allison Scanlan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Fidler / Taylor Jackson vs Paige Gracin / Anna Lask6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY 5.0W 18 & Over (Fidler)40120039
2KY/LOU/MOORE133919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Erin Fidler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.68
Whitney CollinsThompson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.53
Lynn Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Gabrielle Gerlach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Heidi Kane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Jenny Kane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachael Lask
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Kane + Jenny Kane121548% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Davina Elizabeth Meza Cordova
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
Erin Fidler
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
Whitney CollinsThompson
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Lynn Thompson
25W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.53
Gabrielle Gerlach
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.38
Heidi Kane
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
4.21
Jenny Kane
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.15
Rachael Lask
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.