Teams

KY/LOU/SMITH

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & Over LOUISVILLE · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-22vs KY/LOU/MOORESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarmen Schreiber / Paige Gracin vs Ellen Stubbs / Karen Mueller7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Scanlan / Annie Smith vs Sara Moore / Livia Aftenie6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs KY 5.0W 18 & Over (Fidler)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Lampton / Anna Lask vs Erin Fidler / Gabrielle Gerlach4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaige Gracin vs Whitney CollinsThompson2-6, 2-6
2026-05-15vs KY/LOU/MOORESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Ricketts / Allison Scanlan vs Sara Moore / Anne Woosley6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPaige Gracin / Carmen Schreiber vs Jennifer Goselin / Livia Aftenie0-6, 4-6
2026-05-06vs KY 5.0W 18 & Over (Fidler)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Lampton / Allison Scanlan vs Jenny Kane / Heidi Kane4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Gracin / Anna Lask vs Erin Fidler / Taylor Jackson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Alisha Kull
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Annie Smith
published 4.5
4.24
Anna Lask
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Shannon Lampton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Jill Ricketts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.18
Allison Scanlan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Paige Gracin
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Carmen Schreiber
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alisha Kull
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Annie Smith
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Anna Lask
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Shannon Lampton
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Jill Ricketts
25W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Allison Scanlan
43W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
Paige Gracin
19W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Carmen Schreiber
52W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.