Teams

BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ali Jafri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Diego Sabaris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
4.00
Lazar Vukoje
published
4.00
Aleksei Metalnikov
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.95
Peter Stern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Aaron Lee
published 4
3.92
Dennis Duan
published 4
3.89
Gabriel Chan
published
3.85
Spencer Moss
published
3.84
Kelemen Papp
published
3.82
Arman Joachim Jiro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Chuo-Yun Yang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Julian Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
3.75
Angad Chug
published 4
3.75
Wade Conklin
published
3.48
Andrew Krowne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Eugene Hooi
published
Leonard Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Nguyen + Gabriel Chan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ali Jafri
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Diego Sabaris
30W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Lazar Vukoje
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Aleksei Metalnikov
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Peter Stern
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Aaron Lee
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Dennis Duan
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Gabriel Chan
42W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.89
Spencer Moss
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Kelemen Papp
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Arman Joachim Jiro
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Chuo-Yun Yang
32W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Julian Nguyen
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Lucad Ochsendorf Pacheco
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Angad Chug
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Wade Conklin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
4
Andrew Krowne
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Eugene Hooi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leonard Chang
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.