Teams

ACB-Sorry About Your Luck

2025 MIXED 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-20vs S OR-ACB-MardockLost 03
L#1 DoublesNoreen Kaye / Garrett Kaye vs Lucinda Fournier / Douglas Beck7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeena Cook / Wes Matson vs Christina Snyder / Yong Bakos2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Wuepper / Steve Parke vs Kendra Gulley / Andrew Mardock1-6, 2-6
2025-07-20vs STSC-Doubles TroubleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Wuepper / Steve Parke vs Stephenie Tucker / Van Khieu3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNoreen Kaye / Garrett Kaye vs Maggie Hudson / Mark Hoyt6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeena Cook / Wes Matson vs Karen Smith / Danny Tucker6-4, 6-3
2025-07-19vs ESTC-Aces over 40Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnne George / Young Joen vs David Vodvarka / Celeste Sather4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeena Cook / Wes Matson vs Jeff Wright / Anita Geisler6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNoreen Kaye / Garrett Kaye vs Eric Priest / Evangeline Laurie6-1, 6-2
2025-07-18vs ESTC-Funky BunchLost 12
W#1 DoublesGarrett Kaye / Noreen Kaye vs Tami Calkin / Mark Nash6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Wuepper / Steve Parke vs Radona Peterson / Marc Bagarinao5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne George / Young Joen vs Charlotte Ransom / Thomas Jordan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Garrett Kaye
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.35
Anne George
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Deena Cook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Steve Parke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Noreen Kaye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Sarah Wuepper
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Wes Matson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Young Joen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garrett Kaye + Noreen Kaye10759% games+8.2% vs expected
Wes Matson + Deena Cook213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Wuepper + Steve Parke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Garrett Kaye
53W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Anne George
12W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Deena Cook
36W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Steve Parke
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Noreen Kaye
32W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sarah Wuepper
9W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Wes Matson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Young Joen
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.