Teams

Swinging Wood

2025 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 4.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-24vs TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Little / Carmen Little vs Tzu-Hui Chen / Rebecca Newby1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Kreutzer vs Kellee Bates6-0, 6-3
2025-06-19vs TerminettersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Swing / Lauren Kreutzer vs Rilee Moorhead / Bobette Wood5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Vicki McBride vs Jody Mallane / Lisa Sliger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-17Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarmen Little / Natalie Little vs Heather Baird / Julianne Arnell3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMadison Wright vs Courtney Hobbs6-0, 6-1
2025-06-12vs PTSA 4.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Mila Wood vs Tyler Tims / Sydney Crabtree6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDana Gross / Michelle Phillips vs Suzanna Murali / Megan Whitlock6-1, 6-0
2025-06-10vs TerminettersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLori Griffel / Hanna Bigelow vs Syd Komlenic / Oleksandra Ivanova3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Kreutzer vs Lisa Sliger7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Swing / Mila Wood vs Rachel Kincheloe / Tzu-Hui Chen0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMadison Wright vs Payton McGriff6-1, 6-1
2025-06-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarmen Little / Michelle Phillips vs Heather Baird / Courtney Hobbs4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Swing / Debbie Merritt vs Angie O'Hara / Courtney Sticka6-2, 6-1
2025-06-03vs PTSA 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Kreutzer / Mila Wood vs Hanna Jacobs / Emily Thomas6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Swing / Dana Gross vs Megan Whitlock / Sydney Crabtree6-0, 6-2
2025-05-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Kreutzer / Carmen Little vs Maji Daines / Andrea Lambe6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Wright vs Mary Katayama6-4, 6-1
2025-05-20vs PTSA 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Kreutzer / Madison Wright vs Vanessa Almaraz / Tyler Tims6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Vicki McBride vs Sydney Crabtree / Caitlin Zimmerman7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Swinging Wood45252043350
2The Unforced Erras Tour0944182517

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Tessa Staley
published
4.26
Lori Griffel
published
4.26
Mila Wood
published 4.5
4.24
Ashlin Carlisle
published 4.5
4.12
Joelle Staley
published 4.5
4.04
Anya Sandusky
published 4
4.03
Ashley Davis
published 4.5
4.01
Dana Gross
published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.95
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.95
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
Hanna Bigelow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Swing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Kreutzer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Madison Wright
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Natalie Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joelle Staley + Tessa Staley3355% games+0.0% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Dana Rosellini81246% games−0.3% vs expected
Dana Rosellini + Dana Gross282652% games−1.4% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Debbie Merritt4543% games−6.0% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Dana Gross5357% games−6.3% vs expected
Mila Wood + Jennifer Swing12457% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Hanna Bigelow2436% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Kreutzer + Mila Wood6058% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tessa Staley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Lori Griffel
24W–31L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Mila Wood
118W–84L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Ashlin Carlisle
56W–23L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Joelle Staley
65W–70L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Anya Sandusky
187W–100L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Ashley Davis
9W–16L career · type S · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Dana Gross
73W–68L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Hanna Bigelow
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Swing
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Kreutzer
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Madison Wright
35W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
21W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Little
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.