Teams

The Unforced Erras Tour

2025 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 4.03 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-24vs PTSA 4.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Baird / Anneliese Pohl vs Kelly Sturdy / Jee Hur2-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Swinging WoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesDina Bostock / Kelly Wedeven vs Joelle Staley / Tessa Staley0-6, 0-6
2025-06-03vs TerminettersLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnneliese Pohl / Emily Flores vs Becca Longson / Rebecca Newby1-6, 2-6
2025-05-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Bostock / Kelly Wedeven vs Caitlin Zimmerman / Priya Kanaparti6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-27vs Swinging WoodLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnneliese Pohl vs Ashlin Carlisle1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Swinging Wood45252043350
2The Unforced Erras Tour0944182517

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maji Daines
published 4.5
3.97
Heather Baird
published 4
3.94
Mary Katayama
published 4
3.92
Courtney Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 4
3.92
3.91
Julianne Arnell
published 4
3.89
Emily Flores
published 4
3.85
Kelly Wedeven
published 4
3.80
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.76
Tara Wolf
published 4
Anneliese Pohl
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.72
Courtney Sticka
published 4
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.64
Lexi Bruneel
published 4
3.63
Angie O'Hara
published 4
Dina Bostock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa della Badia
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Morgan Mccarthy
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Flores + Tara Wolf4261% games+17.5% vs expected
Alexandra Hodson + Maji Daines23660% games+5.1% vs expected
Emily Flores + Heather Baird10166% games+0.4% vs expected
Kelly Wedeven + Emily Flores2351% games−1.5% vs expected
Angie O'Hara + Patricia Bergstrand111347% games−5.0% vs expected
Kelly Wedeven + Heather Baird3248% games−6.5% vs expected
Dina Bostock + Kelly Wedeven044 matchesnot enough data
Emily Flores + Robyn Roby314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maji Daines
145W–69L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Heather Baird
151W–80L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Mary Katayama
82W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Courtney Hobbs
57W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Patricia Bergstrand
77W–56L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Julianne Arnell
46W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Emily Flores
147W–96L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Kelly Wedeven
93W–83L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Robyn Roby
394W–188L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Tara Wolf
74W–61L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Anneliese Pohl
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Courtney Sticka
85W–69L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Lexi Bruneel
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Angie O'Hara
87W–147L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Dina Bostock
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa della Badia
45W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Mccarthy
1W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.