Teams

Chas Parks & Rec Sutton

2022 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec RitchieLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Delcotto vs Noah Fulks2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Nesler / Joshua Lawson vs Ryan Mullins / Matt Hughes1-6, 1-6
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec RitchieLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoshua Lawson / Brian Delcotto vs Christopher Ritchie / Alex Stacy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Nesler / Matthew Sutton vs Noah Fulks / Ryan Mullins2-6, 0-6
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec RitchieLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoger Cooke / Jeffrey Nesler vs Chris Burt / Noah Fulks1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Delcotto vs Matt Hughes0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Lawson / Matthew Sutton vs Alex Stacy / Ryan Mullins1-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs Chas Parks & Rec RitchieLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Nesler / Brian Delcotto vs Matt Hughes / Jacob Lorenz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Lawson / Matthew Sutton vs Jacob Boone / Alex Stacy1-6, 0-6
2022-06-11vs Chas Parks & Rec RitchieLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Nesler / Joshua Lawson vs Ryan Mullins / Christopher Ritchie1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Delcotto vs Noah Fulks0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SPRING A18&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chas Parks & Rec Ritchie50200051
2Chas Parks & Rec Sutton0502040241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Brian Delcotto
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
David Stacy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Matthew Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Jeffrey Nesler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Joshua Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roger Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Sutton + Brian Delcotto044 matchesnot enough data
Roger Cooke + Matthew Sutton123 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Sutton + Joshua Lawson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Delcotto
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
David Stacy
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Sutton
71W–32L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Jeffrey Nesler
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Lawson
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roger Cooke
6W–19L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.