Teams

Chas Parks & Rec Ritchie

2022 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Ritchie / Chris Burt vs Matthew Sutton / Roger Cooke6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNoah Fulks vs Brian Delcotto6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Mullins / Matt Hughes vs Jeffrey Nesler / Joshua Lawson6-1, 6-1
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Ritchie / Alex Stacy vs Joshua Lawson / Brian Delcotto6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChris Burt vs David Stacy6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNoah Fulks / Ryan Mullins vs Jeffrey Nesler / Matthew Sutton6-2, 6-0
2022-08-27vs Chas Parks & Rec SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Burt / Noah Fulks vs Roger Cooke / Jeffrey Nesler6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMatt Hughes vs Brian Delcotto6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex Stacy / Ryan Mullins vs Joshua Lawson / Matthew Sutton6-1, 6-1
2022-06-30vs Chas Parks & Rec SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Hughes / Jacob Lorenz vs Jeffrey Nesler / Brian Delcotto6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSeena Saadevandi vs David Stacy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacob Boone / Alex Stacy vs Joshua Lawson / Matthew Sutton6-1, 6-0
2022-06-11vs Chas Parks & Rec SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Mullins / Christopher Ritchie vs Jeffrey Nesler / Joshua Lawson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNoah Fulks vs Brian Delcotto6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Burt / Alex Stacy vs Matthew Sutton / Roger Cooke6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SPRING A18&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chas Parks & Rec Ritchie50200051
2Chas Parks & Rec Sutton0502040241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Matt Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.34
Christopher Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Alex Stacy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
James Mcintosh
published 4.5
3.97
Noah Fulks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
JJ Casto
published 4
Chris Burt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jacob Lorenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Seena Saadevandi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Hughes
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Christopher Ritchie
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Alex Stacy
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
James Mcintosh
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Noah Fulks
24W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
4
JJ Casto
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Chris Burt
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jacob Lorenz
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Mullins
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Seena Saadevandi
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.