Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Lobato#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Hufft#4000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Chivardi#2000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Quevedo#6000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Bordier#1000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Lobato#5000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Davis#3000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Carrie Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Daniela Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4.5
4.00
Iliana Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.28
Blanca Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3.5
Leila Lobato
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Mayela Baca
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Natalia Castaneda
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisa Porras + Iliana Sandoval10659% games+2.7% vs expected
Iliana Sandoval + Daniela Ibarra9453% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Iliana Sandoval8359% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Marisa Porras9160% gamesnot enough data
Iliana Sandoval + Blanca Olmos3550% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Blanca Olmos134 matchesnot enough data
Blanca Olmos + Mayela Baca314 matchesnot enough data
Cathey Jo Alberson + Carrie Alberson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carrie Alberson
6W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Daniela Ibarra
70W–43L career · 17 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Iliana Sandoval
58W–42L career · 17 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 14 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Blanca Olmos
95W–73L career · 44 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Leila Lobato
65W–61L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–53L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
43W–34L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mayela Baca
19W–9L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalia Castaneda
39W–28L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.