GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Davis#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEPTA

Flight standings6 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Hufft#4	0	0	0	0	0	0
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Chivardi#2	0	0	0	0	0	0
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Quevedo#6	0	0	0	0	0	0
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Bordier#1	0	0	0	0	0	0
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Lobato#5	0	0	0	0	0	0
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5W/Davis#3	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81

Christianne Alvarez

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.36

Alexandra Ortiz

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.02

Belinda Fernandez

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

—

Lori DeLisser

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Martha Canales

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Maru Barua

usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published —

—

Megan Harris

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Miroslava Barua

usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Rocio Mora

published —

—

Tara Davis

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Yesica Ortega

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miroslava Barua + Maru Barua	41–13	57% games	−1.1% vs expected
Lori DeLisser + Tara Davis	4–3	50% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Christianne Alvarez

7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026

1%90%8%

3.81

3.5

Alexandra Ortiz

36W–36L career · 16 lines in 2026

<1%83%16%

3.36

3.5

Belinda Fernandez

54W–62L career · type A · 13 lines in 2026

43%57%<1%

3.02

—

Lori DeLisser

94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Martha Canales

59W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Maru Barua

47W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Megan Harris

67W–10L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Miroslava Barua

56W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rocio Mora

46W–23L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Tara Davis

65W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yesica Ortega

2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.