Teams

SALESIAN HS 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Aaron Ilan vs Jihye Kim / Evan McCartney-Melstad6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachel Shuen / Dominic Aiello vs Jodi Munson / Anandkumar Patel6-0, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Sang Woo Ham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Rachel Shuen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Inderjit Dhillon
published
3.35
Julie Borjon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Susan Weeks
published
3.31
Aaron Ilan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Marla Aufmuth
published
3.27
Dennis Totah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Mindy Williams
published
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
published 3.5
3.11
Doug van Slyke
published
3.10
Tamara Hurwitz
published
3.10
Nicholas Paige
published
2.89
Fedwa Booth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dominic Aiello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Woolf
published
Judith Silver
published
MacE Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Borjon + Aaron Ilan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sang Woo Ham
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Rachel Shuen
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Inderjit Dhillon
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Susan Weeks
25W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Aaron Ilan
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Marla Aufmuth
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Dennis Totah
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Mindy Williams
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Doug van Slyke
8W–22L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Tamara Hurwitz
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Nicholas Paige
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Dominic Aiello
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Woolf
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judith Silver
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MacE Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.