Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX7.0D

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-19vs LOS GATOS SR 40MX7.0BWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshok Anumandla / Jeannie Mirassou vs Kristin Dillehay / Darin Dillehay6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGreg Riggs / Karen Rogge vs Charla Serbent / Gary Serbent6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKash Sethi / Renee Cantu Hill vs Katie McBride / Joe Menkhaus6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Brian McCombs
published 4
3.79
Ashok Anumandla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Sandra Morizawa
published
3.70
Martin Lundie
published
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
published
3.61
Tim Bergeson
published
3.52
Greg Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Balazs Korom
published 3.5
3.40
Karen Rogge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Pooja Tendulkar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Renee Cantu Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.11
Jing Gu
published
3.11
Kash Sethi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Antonio Diaz
published 3
Domenico Azzollini
published
Irina Rahn
published
Jeannie Mirassou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irina Rahn + Ashok Anumandla303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian McCombs
28W–5L career · type D · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Ashok Anumandla
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Sandra Morizawa
23W–29L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Martin Lundie
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Patama Suvarnarat
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Tim Bergeson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Greg Riggs
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Balazs Korom
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Karen Rogge
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Pooja Tendulkar
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Renee Cantu Hill
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kash Sethi
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Antonio Diaz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Domenico Azzollini
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Irina Rahn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeannie Mirassou
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.