Teams

SFV - Stingers

2025 Adult 40+ Weekday SFV · SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesMaarit Fenwick / Cristina Nava vs Alexandra Steele Cooper / Stefani Galvagni0-6, 6-7
2025-02-25vs SFV - Volley VixensWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaarit Fenwick / Cristina Nava vs Nicole Emmons / Jonae Fedors6-0, 7-6
L#1 DoublesMaarit Fenwick / Cristina Nava vs Deidre Hope / Amy Randles3-6, 3-6
2025-01-30vs SFV - Love All AroundWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaarit Fenwick / Cristina Nava vs Renee Fields / Melissa Hariton6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Michelle Tesoro
published
3.08
2.91
Cristina Nava
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Youngju Navarro
published
2.76
Maarit Fenwick
published
2.74
Angie Wu
published 3
2.73
Kimberly Clayton
published
2.72
Joanne Cho
published
2.55
Sherry Gordon
published
2.54
Monica Gianni
published
2.51
Sheri Schwarzbach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Yongyuan Wen + Cristina Nava8261% games+7.3% vs expected
Kimberly Clayton + Sheri Schwarzbach3252% games+5.9% vs expected
Maarit Fenwick + Youngju Navarro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Tesoro
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Michelle Yongyuan Wen
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3
Cristina Nava
68W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Youngju Navarro
23W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Maarit Fenwick
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Angie Wu
7W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kimberly Clayton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Joanne Cho
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Sherry Gordon
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Monica Gianni
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Sheri Schwarzbach
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.