Teams

Rally Girls

2026 40&Over Women Spring · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-05vs Get A GripLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarguerite Portagallo / Jill Pincus vs Eileen Belmonte / Lisa Mason2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNorma Stojanovski vs Nicole Inkrote1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLucia Marchetta / Mary Ricardo vs Theresa Turner / Melissa Ylagan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Jones / Beth Witte vs Patty Branthover / Lisa Mikovits5-7, 1-6
2026-05-29vs Bad AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Goldzweig / Amy Stark vs Gerilyn Mahlof / Melissa McManus6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMadeline Devito vs Diana Russillo6-2, 3-0
2026-05-15vs Hits and GigglesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNagihan Akin / Gena Orlando vs Jennifer Walsh / Mary Jane Manners6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMadeline Devito vs Dorinda Murphy6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebra Schoengood / Beth Witte vs Jaime Shapiro / Susan Cranley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Ricardo / Janet Applebaum vs Suzanne Mazzucca / Bonnie Russo1-6, 3-6
2026-05-08vs Sassy StringsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Goldzweig / Amy Stark vs Marylou Finer-Feldstein / Cecilia Altonaga6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Jones / Lucia Marchetta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-01vs Baby Got BackhandWon 31
L#1 DoublesLaurie Goldzweig / Amy Stark vs Danielle Alpaugh / Heather Tormey6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNorma Stojanovski vs Keri Bryceland6-3, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGena Orlando / Madeline Devito vs Tara Patlen / Kathryn Hartigan6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarguerite Portagallo / Jennifer Martin vs Bridget Duffy / Elizabeth Luttenberger6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLaurie Goldzweig / Amy Stark vs Irina Reznik / Karlee Sealove7-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNagihan Akin vs Jennifer Guarino2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline Devito / Sema Akin vs Bei Hu / Jessica Lereah6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Pincus / Beth Witte vs Saba Khan / Danielle Longyear3-6, 5-7
2026-04-10vs Racquet ScientistsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSema Akin / Amy Stark vs Jennifer Bautista / Julie Raymond2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLucia Marchetta / Mary Ricardo vs Carey Begley / Nancy Goodman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Gena Orlando
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Amy Stark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Laurie Goldzweig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Beth Witte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Sema Akin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Mary Ricardo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Lucia Marchetta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Norma Stojanovski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Jill Pincus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Marguerite Portagallo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Madeline Devito
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Nagihan Akin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Margaret Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Debra Schoengood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Janet Applebaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemarie Federico
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Goldzweig + Jill Pincus5259% games+11.9% vs expected
Sema Akin + Madeline Devito6262% games+11.0% vs expected
Lucia Marchetta + Sema Akin7255% games+10.4% vs expected
Amy Stark + Laurie Goldzweig12658% games+6.6% vs expected
Laurie Goldzweig + Sema Akin11362% games+6.5% vs expected
Marguerite Portagallo + Lucia Marchetta9750% games+5.3% vs expected
Lucia Marchetta + Jill Pincus4253% games+2.8% vs expected
Nagihan Akin + Gena Orlando11555% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gena Orlando
37W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Amy Stark
35W–29L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Laurie Goldzweig
87W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Beth Witte
45W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sema Akin
56W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Mary Ricardo
66W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Lucia Marchetta
100W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Norma Stojanovski
34W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Jill Pincus
30W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Marguerite Portagallo
73W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Madeline Devito
113W–164L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Nagihan Akin
46W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Margaret Jones
34W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Debra Schoengood
23W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Janet Applebaum
10W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Rosemarie Federico
30W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.