Teams

Racquet Scientists

2026 40&Over Women Spring · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-05vs Hits and GigglesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bautista / Julie Raymond vs Mary Jane Manners / Jaime Shapiro6-2, 7-5
2026-05-29vs Baby Got BackhandLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Raymond / Christina Longo vs Heather Tormey / Jennifer Borenius1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMegan Loewenberg / Videsha Joshi vs Erica Kaplan / Kim Silberman6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Mazzeo / Kristin Smythe vs Jessica Lereah / Randi Marder2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnne Weinstein / Ilene Pardon vs Michele Friedman / Karlee Sealove4-6, 3-6
2026-05-08vs Bad AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Dube / Christina Longo vs Laryn Cullen / Gerilyn Mahlof4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGina Mazzeo / Julie Raymond vs Jacqueline Mason / Diana Russillo6-1, 6-2
2026-04-24vs Sassy StringsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bautista / Julie Raymond vs Susan Klein / Marylou Finer-Feldstein6-2, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJennifer Costa vs Cheryl Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-10vs Rally GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bautista / Julie Raymond vs Sema Akin / Amy Stark6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Julie Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Jennifer Bautista
published
2.81
Anne Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Megan Loewenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Videsha Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Maureen Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.72
Christine Silva
published 3
2.71
Christina Longo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Jennifer Costa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Gina Mazzeo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Carey Begley
published 3
2.51
Sharon Palazzo
published
2.44
Sandy Hsyu
published
2.25
Kara Zlotnick
published
Michelle Cuneo
published
Nancy Goodman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Silva + Gina Mazzeo2341% gamesnot enough data
Kara Zlotnick + Sandy Hsyu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Raymond
22W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Jennifer Bautista
47W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Anne Weinstein
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Megan Loewenberg
33W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Videsha Joshi
25W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Maureen Edwards
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Christine Silva
45W–52L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Christina Longo
33W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Jennifer Costa
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Gina Mazzeo
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Carey Begley
15W–15L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Sharon Palazzo
22W–14L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Sandy Hsyu
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Kara Zlotnick
29W–42L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Michelle Cuneo
3W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Goodman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.