Teams

LA - Sets on Fire

2026 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Men 5.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 27 4:00 PM
Cheviot Hills Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs LA - Fellowship of the StringWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuke Roloff / Federico Rolon vs Charlie Werman / Maalik Konop-Defreitas6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarc van Eekeren / Alexander Wood vs Jeremy Wacker / Jonathan Kui6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPhilip Vorsilak / Charles Livaudais vs Louis Werman / Bryan Zhang6-2, 6-3
2026-08-23vs LA - United NationsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Sperling / Brett Buford vs Daniel Keolasy / Shaurya Dhankar6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlexander Wood / Scott Gaynor vs Joshua Chou / Davis Kop7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCharles Livaudais / Steve Kim vs Andrew Whitman / Stephen Whitman7-5, 6-5
2026-08-16vs LA - United NationsLost 03
L#1 DoublesThanos Kantarelis / Federico Rolon vs Stefan Cutovic / Kyle Vo2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrandon Joe / Alexander Wood vs Davis Kop / Shaurya Dhankar3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChase Wrenn / Kenneth Park vs Aaron Robles / Andrew Whitman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-08vs LA - Fellowship of the StringWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Gaynor / Brandon Joe vs Jeremy Wacker / Ariel Maidansky3-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesKevin Tan / Steve Kim vs Kerry Chen / Alon Borten6-1, 6-2
2026-07-26vs LA - United NationsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuke Roloff / Amit Gupta vs Bryson Lee / Javeed Kassam6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlexander Wood / John Lansville vs Daniel Hermosisima / Davis Kop6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPhilip Vorsilak / Yorland Tellez vs Ethan Waldman / Stephen Whitman2-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs LA - Fellowship of the StringWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Sperling / Henry Mak vs Maalik Konop-Defreitas / Charlie Werman6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrandon Joe / Alexander Wood vs Jonas Stasevicius / Randy Tran6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChase Wrenn / Kevin Tan vs Louis Werman / Kerry Chen7-6, 6-4
2026-07-11vs LA - Fellowship of the StringWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmit Gupta / Thanos Kantarelis vs Josh Hublitz / Michael Burr6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrandon Joe / Alexander Wood vs Eric Fandel / Nicholas de Goede2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChase Wrenn / Charles Livaudais vs Jeremy Wacker / Bryan Zhang6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Henry Mak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.72
Natan Spear
published
4.72
Brett Buford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Federico Rolon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.56
Jeffrey Sperling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.54
Luke Roloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.53
Thanos Kantarelis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Alexander Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
John Lansville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Kevin Tan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Yorland Tellez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Amit Gupta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.93
Kenneth Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Charles Livaudais
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Philip Vorsilak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Chase Wrenn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Scott Gaynor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lansville + Alexander Wood213 matchesnot enough data
Thanos Kantarelis + Amit Gupta213 matchesnot enough data
Thanos Kantarelis + Federico Rolon123 matchesnot enough data
Amit Gupta + Luke Roloff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry Mak
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
Natan Spear
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Brett Buford
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Federico Rolon
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Jeffrey Sperling
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
Luke Roloff
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Thanos Kantarelis
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.53
4.5
Alexander Wood
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
John Lansville
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Kevin Tan
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Yorland Tellez
31W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.02
Kenneth Park
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Charles Livaudais
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Philip Vorsilak
39W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Chase Wrenn
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Scott Gaynor
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.