Teams

LA - Fellowship of the String

2026 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Men 5.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Westchester Park
Oct 3 4:00 PM
Cheviot Hills Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs LA - Sets on FireLost 12
W#1 DoublesCharlie Werman / Maalik Konop-Defreitas vs Luke Roloff / Federico Rolon7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeremy Wacker / Jonathan Kui vs Marc van Eekeren / Alexander Wood1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLouis Werman / Bryan Zhang vs Philip Vorsilak / Charles Livaudais2-6, 3-6
2026-08-15vs LA - United NationsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaalik Konop-Defreitas / Charlie Werman vs Stefan Cutovic / Daniel Keolasy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Hill / James Soehardjono vs Charles Barrantes / Bryan Hudson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLouis Werman / Kerry Chen vs Delmar Kaiser / Shaan Arora0-6, 0-6
2026-08-08vs LA - Sets on FireLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeremy Wacker / Ariel Maidansky vs Scott Gaynor / Brandon Joe6-3, 5-5
L#3 DoublesKerry Chen / Alon Borten vs Kevin Tan / Steve Kim1-6, 2-6
2026-07-25vs LA - Sets on FireLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaalik Konop-Defreitas / Charlie Werman vs Jeffrey Sperling / Henry Mak4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonas Stasevicius / Randy Tran vs Brandon Joe / Alexander Wood3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLouis Werman / Kerry Chen vs Chase Wrenn / Kevin Tan6-7, 4-6
2026-07-19vs LA - United NationsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Cheatham / Charlie Werman vs Daniel Keolasy / Javeed Kassam7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJonas Stasevicius / Ariel Maidansky vs Joshua Chou / Davis Kop2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Chen / Jeremy Wacker vs Ethan Waldman / Matthew Lam1-6, 6-7
2026-07-11vs LA - Sets on FireLost 12
W#1 DoublesJosh Hublitz / Michael Burr vs Amit Gupta / Thanos Kantarelis7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Fandel / Nicholas de Goede vs Brandon Joe / Alexander Wood2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeremy Wacker / Bryan Zhang vs Chase Wrenn / Charles Livaudais0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · LA - Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - United Nations31841094
2LA - Fellowship of the String0531225170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Maalik Konop-Defreitas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.70
Charlie Werman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.54
Michael Cheatham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Eric Fandel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Jeremy Wacker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ariel Maidansky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Nicholas de Goede
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Kerry Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Jonathan Kui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
James Soehardjono
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Louis Werman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alon Borten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bryan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Andrew Dillard
published 3.5
Jonas Stasevicius
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Hublitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maalik Konop-Defreitas + Charlie Werman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maalik Konop-Defreitas
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Charlie Werman
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
Michael Cheatham
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Eric Fandel
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.36
Jeremy Wacker
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.25
4.5
Ariel Maidansky
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Nicholas de Goede
81W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Kerry Chen
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.10
Jonathan Kui
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
James Soehardjono
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.89
Louis Werman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
3.77
4
Alon Borten
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Bryan Zhang
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Dillard
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jonas Stasevicius
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Josh Hublitz
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Randy Tran
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Hill
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.