Teams

MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Bloomington Green

2022 MSIL Mixed 40 & Over -West League · West MSIL 40 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesTodd Donalson / Kari McGhee vs Matt Heimstead / Stephanie Madix3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen McRaven / Maureen Fulton vs Chris Doscotch / Susie Sorenson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesStephen McRaven / Kimberly Bellamy vs Matt Heimstead / Sampa Ostrem6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Sarnowski / Lisa Sarnowski vs Joe Totten / Janelle Knight2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStephen McRaven / Susie Howe vs Matt Heimstead / Courtney Turnbull6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen McRaven / Kimberly Bellamy vs Joe Totten / Sampa Ostrem1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJane Clark / Sean Miller vs Sampa Ostrem / Jon Sutter3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTodd Donalson / Sally Mangina vs Janelle Knight / Matt Heimstead0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSean Miller / Jane Clark vs Jon Sutter / Sampa Ostrem3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Donalson / Sally Mangina vs Joe Totten / Janelle Knight1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTodd Donalson / Jane Clark vs Joe Totten / Stephanie Plautz0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Peterson / Susie Howe vs Matt Heimstead / Louella Amos6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSean Miller / Karen Disharoon vs Chris Doscotch / Stephanie Madix4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTodd Donalson / Karen Disharoon vs Joe Totten / Stephanie Plautz0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDr Anupam Radhakrishnan / Kimberly Bellamy vs Matt Heimstead / Louella Amos5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSean Miller / Jane Clark vs Chris Doscotch / Colleen Curran4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSean Miller / Jane Clark vs Jon Sutter / Sampa Ostrem5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Sarnowski / Lisa Sarnowski vs Joe Totten / Courtney Turnbull3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDr Anupam Radhakrishnan / Susie Howe vs Chris Doscotch / Susie Sorenson1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSean Miller / Jane Clark vs Jon Sutter / Sampa Ostrem4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Sarnowski / Lisa Sarnowski vs Chris Doscotch / Susie Sorenson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTodd Donalson / Susie Howe vs Mrinal Das / Colleen Curran4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSean Miller / Karen Disharoon vs Brandon Myers / Stephanie Madix6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Donalson / Susie Howe vs Mrinal Das / Colleen Curran3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDr Anupam Radhakrishnan / Karen Disharoon vs Mrinal Das / Janelle Knight3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSean Miller / Kari McGhee vs Brandon Myers / Stephanie Madix3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · West MSIL 40 & Over 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Ostrem-Bloomington12031512188
2MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Bloomington Green01253166415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Ana Castano-Mears
published 4.5
4.11
Susie Howe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.07
Justin Huffman
published
4.04
Maureen Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Kimberly Bellamy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Sally Mangina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brad Peterson
published
David Sarnowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Clark
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Karen Disharoon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kari McGhee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Sarnowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen McRaven
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Todd Donalson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sarnowski + David Sarnowski191156% gamesnot enough data
Sally Mangina + Todd Donalson0615% gamesnot enough data
Kari McGhee + Todd Donalson044 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Bellamy + Stephen McRaven224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Susie Howe
56W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Justin Huffman
23W–23L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
Maureen Fulton
103W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.04
Kimberly Bellamy
67W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dr Anupam Radhakrishnan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Brad Peterson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
David Sarnowski
30W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Clark
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Disharoon
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kari McGhee
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Sarnowski
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen McRaven
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Donalson
1W–34L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.