Teams

Marco YMCA - Correa

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-06vs Stonebridge - Small-CarrollWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeggy Chandler / Pattie Yergler vs Katie Neuman / Nancy Moriarty6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Correa / Nancy McCune vs Janet Elegant / Geraldine Grillo6-3, 6-3
2023-02-20vs Players Club - FreemanWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy Chandler / Pattie Yergler vs Mary Egan / Patricia Freeman6-3, 6-3
2023-02-13vs Naples Beach Hotel - EddyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Correa / Nancy McCune vs Barbara Frank / Susan Parsons1-6, 3-6
2023-02-06vs Treviso Bay - D. PallerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNancy McCune / Peggy Chandler vs Darlene Carpenter / Deborah Paller6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Garofalo / Pattie Yergler vs Virginia Southall / Joyce Perry6-4, 6-4
2023-01-30vs Players Club - DaSilvaWon 10
W#1 DoublesPattie Yergler / Peggy Chandler vs Susan Sliker / Laurie Dwyer7-6, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Lynn Lauck / Elisabeth Teller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-16vs Pelican Bay North - HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Reichhard / Nancy McCune vs Rosemary Marinone / Patricia Miles6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Karen Correa
published
3.33
Janet Reichhard
published
3.29
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Doyen
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Nancy McCune
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Sally Mattke
published
3.14
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
3.11
Peggy Chandler
published
2.59
Claire Babrowski
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattie Yergler + Karen Correa7749% games+2.0% vs expected
Patricia Doyen + Janet Reichhard6257% gamesnot enough data
Nancy McCune + Karen Correa224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Correa + Deb Dorsey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Janet Reichhard
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Patricia Doyen
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Nancy McCune
75W–142L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Brita Swanson
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Peggy Chandler
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
3
Claire Babrowski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.