Teams

Players Club - Freeman

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-06vs Treviso Bay - D. PallerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Pascale / Karen Terzano vs Janet Ellis / Joan Barrett1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Egan / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Connie Mosbaugh / Joyce Perry6-2, 6-2
2023-02-27vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteWon 10
W#1 DoublesLoyce Snyder / Karen Terzano vs Anna Lis / Kristi Klukas3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-20vs Marco YMCA - CorreaWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Kedrowski / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Patricia Doyen / Joan van Glabek6-3, 6-4
2023-02-13vs Marco YMCA - CashinWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Terzano / Sue Wolf vs Isabelle Adly / Shelley Hertz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Kedrowski / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Celia Rogers / Patti Ramer6-4, 6-3
2023-02-06vs Fiddlers Creek - L.KeelyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLoyce Snyder / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Dorothea Farmer / Dale Zumsande6-3, 6-2
2023-02-01vs Naples Beach Hotel - EddyWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoyce Snyder / Karen Terzano vs Susan Magno / Jennifer Archie6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Egan / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Patricia Hanes / Barbara Frank6-2, 6-4
2023-01-30vs World Tennis Club -Won 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Kropko / Cindy Kedrowski vs Carol Loebs / Cathy Guida6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSheryl Gebhart / Karen Terzano vs Sharon Case / Rebecca Meath6-4, 6-1
2023-01-09vs Sterling Oaks - GlobermanWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Terzano / Sheryl Gebhart vs Lynda Giannetta / Jennifer Heimmel6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDodie Gallagher / Cindy Kedrowski vs Tobi Weinstein / Susan Portscher6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ann McDonald
published 3.5
3.16
Beth Kropko
published 3.5
3.06
Karen Terzano
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Sharon Oppenheimer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cindy Kedrowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Freeman
published
Sue Wolf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Oppenheimer + Cindy Kedrowski6068% gamesnot enough data
Sue Wolf + Patricia Freeman3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann McDonald
49W–56L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Beth Kropko
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Karen Terzano
52W–65L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Sharon Oppenheimer
84W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Cindy Kedrowski
48W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Freeman
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Wolf
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.