Teams

Fiddlers Creek - L.Keely

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-13vs Players Club - DaSilvaWon 10
W#3 DoublesMagdalen MacEntee / Dorothea Farmer vs Coral-Jeanne O'Connor / Pat Nourbash6-1, 6-0
2023-02-06vs Players Club - FreemanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Dale Zumsande vs Loyce Snyder / Sharon Oppenheimer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Wacker / Peggy Keigley vs Kathleen Staudinger / Patricia Freeman7-6, 6-4
2023-01-31vs Treviso Bay - D. PallerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLucinda Winzenried / Peggy Keigley vs Constance Cape / Janet Ellis6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMagdalen MacEntee / Dorothea Farmer vs Connie Mosbaugh / Deborah Paller3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-30vs Naples Beach Hotel - EddyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Dale Zumsande vs Carola Heinrich / Martha Peterson4-6, 4-6
2023-01-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesLucinda Winzenried / Peggy Keigley vs Sandra Schrader / Geraldine Grillo6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Dale Zumsande vs Janet Elegant / Lisa Zimmerli6-2, 6-2
2023-01-09vs Pelican Bay North - HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Patricia Wacker vs Judy Howell / Jincie Duane3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Linda Koole
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Keely
published
3.10
Dorothea Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Victoria Pollock
published
2.62
Carolyn Marek
published 3
Gloria Anderson
published
Lou Ann Letman
published
Nancy Ambrosio
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Swafford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Keigley + Dorothea Farmer8552% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Keigley + Linda Koole6168% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Dorothea Farmer3251% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Peggy Keigley303 matchesnot enough data
Linda Keely + Sharon Swafford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Linda Koole
123W–93L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Dorothea Farmer
99W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Carolyn Marek
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
2.62
Gloria Anderson
57W–73L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lou Ann Letman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Ambrosio
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Swafford
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.