Teams

LATA18/Hilts/LCTC

2023 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-28vs LATA18/Squires/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Rebecca Stevenson / Chris Lefebvre5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-21vs LATA18/Henderson/LCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesCathy Cagney / Debbie Gee vs Casie Henderson / Debra Sklar3-6, 4-6
2023-03-14vs LATA18/DOWNS/RCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Holmes / Cathy Cagney vs Susie Leroy / Jennifer Wild6-2, 6-4
2023-03-07vs LATA18/Stewart/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Lisa Maylath / Paulette Nulman6-2, 6-3
2023-03-01vs LATA18/Gore/LCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesCecilia Nilsson / Cathy Cagney vs Dana Burke / Susan Taylor6-7, 2-6
2023-02-21vs LATA18/Squires/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Pamela DeBessonet / Arlene Wilkes6-3, 6-0
2023-02-14vs LATA18/Henderson/LCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Casie Henderson / Gena McCoy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-31vs LATA18/Stewart/SSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesTonya Swalgren / Cathy Cagney vs Jeanie Farmer / Diana Sarto6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Cecilia Nilsson
published 4
3.44
Corrina Kleemoff
published 3.5
3.33
Debbie Gee
published 3.5
3.31
Cathy Cagney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Denise Holmes
published 3.5
3.23
Megan Peeples
published
3.20
Lori Yuris
published
3.15
Tonya Swalgren
published
3.15
Meg Estes
published
Gina Hilts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tonya Swalgren + Denise Holmes10357% games+5.1% vs expected
Lori Yuris + Cecilia Nilsson5455% games+2.7% vs expected
Meg Estes + Megan Peeples3451% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Nilsson
43W–17L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Corrina Kleemoff
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Gee
34W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cathy Cagney
47W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Denise Holmes
20W–28L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Megan Peeples
16W–24L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Lori Yuris
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Tonya Swalgren
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Meg Estes
31W–40L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Gina Hilts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.