Teams

LATA18/Henderson/LCC

2023 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Beth McCorkle
published 3.5
3.34
Ami Coats
published 3.5
3.34
Kristin Senn
published
3.30
Jan Bigg
published
3.29
Maryann Simons
published
3.25
Page Edwards
published
3.23
Angie McCoy
published 3.5
3.23
Kris Sutton
published
3.23
Casie Henderson
published 3.5
3.21
Stefanie Carpenter
published
3.18
Debra Sklar
published 3.5
3.05
Lilian Joye
published
Crystal Sanders
published 3
Gena McCoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casie Henderson + Page Edwards3255% games−0.8% vs expected
Debra Sklar + Page Edwards0528% games−7.3% vs expected
Casie Henderson + Angie McCoy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth McCorkle
158W–71L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Ami Coats
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Kristin Senn
55W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Jan Bigg
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Maryann Simons
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Page Edwards
36W–38L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Angie McCoy
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kris Sutton
77W–65L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Casie Henderson
31W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Stefanie Carpenter
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Debra Sklar
40W–45L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Lilian Joye
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Christy Funderburk
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Crystal Sanders
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gena McCoy
23W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.