Teams

NJ ORANGE

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs CK REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Bottinelli / William Skelton vs Gerald Russell / Steve Dallman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs LTFC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Skelton / Dan Bottinelli vs Gordon Carpenter / Bradford Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs DTC PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Skelton / Dan Bottinelli vs John Gordon / Patrick Broe7-5, 6-1
2025-07-09vs SS-H ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Stewart / Gregory Idler vs Dale Reinhardt / Ken Kaiser4-6, 4-6
2025-07-02vs MC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Bland / Dan Bottinelli vs Tom Seeton / Christopher Ayala6-4, 6-2
2025-06-25vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Stewart / Gregory Idler vs Reed Haddock / Dugger Jamison6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Gregory Idler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Gary Bland
published 3
2.99
Dan Bottinelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Greg Olson
published 3
Gary Ashley
published 3
2.58
Thomas Stephens
published
Manny Selva
published
Michael Everard
published
Mike Stewart
published
William Skelton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Bottinelli + Mike Stewart3643% games−4.6% vs expected
William Skelton + Michael Everard6154% gamesnot enough data
Dan Bottinelli + Gregory Idler3257% gamesnot enough data
Gary Ashley + Mike Stewart3254% gamesnot enough data
Dan Bottinelli + Greg Olson213 matchesnot enough data
William Skelton + Thomas Stephens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gregory Idler
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Gary Bland
103W–75L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Dan Bottinelli
43W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Greg Olson
15W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gary Ashley
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Stephens
17W–39L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Manny Selva
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Everard
37W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Stewart
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Skelton
27W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.