← Search

William Skelton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Superior, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 36W–34L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history70 matches
W
2026-06-24 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Everard
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-10 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory Idler
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
Bob Rogers / Jim Migel
2025-10-11 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Stephens championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-10 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Bottinelli championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-13 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Bland championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
Gary McBride / Keow Ng
2025-09-13 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Bottinelli championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-06 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Bottinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Gordon Carpenter / Bradford Smith
2025-07-23 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Bottinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
John Gordon / Patrick Broe
2025-07-16 · NJ ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Bottinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-07-09 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Bland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-04 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leon Gonzales
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-2
W
2025-05-28 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Everard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.1% of games
6.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 29.4% of games
5.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer