Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Arreola/40&over/3.0W71301025266
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)71281231288
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(DaCosta)(EPTC#1)53231738325
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)53192146339
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Boss)(EPTC#2)35211945369
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC)35172348348
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)26152554399
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)26132758392
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)26122858377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Cecilia Marquez
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
Clara C Esparza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Esther McCarthy
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Leticia Augsberger
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melinda Pineda
published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Sharon Ransom
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Vera Ray
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Sharon Ransom161252% games+6.0% vs expected
Vera Ray + Sharon Ransom91344% games+4.3% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Esther McCarthy6945% games+2.3% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Augsberger + Esther McCarthy6943% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Cecilia Marquez7456% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Sara Blanco0931% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Sharon Ransom5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Marquez
64W–57L career · 22 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Clara C Esparza
16W–32L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Esther McCarthy
74W–87L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 30 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leticia Augsberger
26W–61L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–47L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Pineda
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–69L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Ransom
66W–107L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vera Ray
31W–62L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.